Oura Ring Gen 4 sensor data — not clinical measurementsN=1 case study — not validated for clinical decisionsHEV diagnosed Mar 18; interpret findings cautiously in this Day 15 post-ruxolitinib window

Patient Comparison

Henrik (HSCT) vs Mitch (Stroke)
Generated 2026-03-31 10:21 · Post-HSCT Patient
Henrik Days
Info
80.0
2026-01-05 → 2026-03-30
Mitch Days
Info
513.0
2021-02-21 → 2026-03-31
Overlap
Info
2026-01-05 → 2026-03-30

Clinical Context

Henrik — MDS-AML / Post-HSCT
Born Nov 1989 (age 36). MDS-AML, allogeneic HSCT Nov 2023 (age 34).
Multi-organ chronic GvHD. Ruxolitinib 10mg BID from Mar 2026.
HEV diagnosed Mar 2026. Oura Gen 4.
Mitch — Childhood ALL Survivor + Post-Stroke
Born Sept 1989 (age 36). ALL at 14 (likely anthracyclines, vincristine).
Bilateral carotid/vertebral dissection with stroke at 33 (left main).
20+ yrs late effects: cardiotoxicity, autonomic neuropathy. Oura Gen 3.
Shared Clinical Profile
Both hematologic cancer survivors (ALL vs MDS-AML). Both treated with anthracyclines (Mitch as child, Henrik as adult with idarubicin). Both with subsequent neurovascular/neuroimmunologic complications. Same age (2 months apart). Both with elevated resting HR and autonomic dysfunction via different mechanisms: Mitch from accumulated cardiotoxicity + stroke; Henrik from GvHD + immunosuppression.

Summary Comparison

Resting Heart Rate

Heart Rate Variability

Sleep Duration

Sleep Efficiency

Interpretation

Key differences:

  • Resting HR: Henrik avg 81 bpm vs Mitch 83 bpm. Henrik's elevated HR is consistent with post-HSCT autonomic dysfunction and IST.
  • HRV: Henrik avg 9.3 ms vs Mitch 51.0 ms. Henrik's suppressed HRV reflects immunosuppression-related autonomic impairment.
  • Sleep duration: Henrik avg 6.0h vs Mitch 6.7h.
  • Deep sleep: Henrik avg 19.3% vs Mitch 22.6%.
  • Efficiency: Henrik avg 79% vs Mitch 83%.

Caveat: Henrik has 80 days of data, Mitch has 513. Mitch's data is from Gen 3 (limited sensors). Direct comparison is observational only.